From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261678AbUBWByd (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:54:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261777AbUBWByd (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:54:33 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:920 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261678AbUBWByc (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:54:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:55:07 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.3-mm3 Message-Id: <20040222175507.558a5b3d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <40395ACE.4030203@cyberone.com.au> References: <20040222172200.1d6bdfae.akpm@osdl.org> <40395ACE.4030203@cyberone.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > >ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.3/2.6.3-mm2/ > > > > > > URL is of course, > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.3/2.6.3-mm3/ Yes, thanks. > This still doesn't shrink slab correctly on highmem machines > because you dropped my patch :( First, one needs to define "correctly". Certainly, it is not "solves the alleged updatedb problem". The design behind the slab shrinking is to reclaim slab in response to memory demand. Not in response to lowmem demand. With all the scaling, accounting-for-seeks-and-locality, etc.