From: Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens-dated-1078360505.b6b1@endorphin.org>
To: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/proposal] dm-crypt: add digest-based iv generation mode
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:35:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040223003504.GA15110@ghanima.endorphin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040219170228.GA10483@leto.cs.pocnet.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1776 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:02:32PM +0100, Christophe Saout wrote:
> since some people keep complaining that the IV generation mechanisms
> supplied in cryptoloop (and now dm-crypt) are insecure, which they
> somewhat are, I just hacked a small digest based IV generation mechanism.
>
> It simply hashes the sector number and the key and uses it as IV.
>
> You can specify the encryption mode as "cipher-digest" like aes-md5 or
> serpent-sha1 or some other combination.
I actually would prefer that cipher algorithm and cipher mode are seperated.
It's just a matter of personal taste that I'd like to stick things where I
think they belong. So imho it would be nicer to split this string into two
seperate: one for the cipher algorithm, the other for the mode of operation,
namely, "ecb" or "cbc-<ivmode>".
> Consider this as a proposal, I'm not a crypto expert. Tell me if it
> contains other flaws that should be fixed.
No obvious flaws for me. I've already argued in private different IV mode,
but one more time for the public ;) : I embraced the principal of reusing
components in security systems instead of depending on a large number on
different subsystems. The only IV mode which can finally make sence for me
is the use of cipher algorithm as hash algorithm. This will keep the risk of
breakage of the system by the insecurity of one component to a minimum. A
pratical reason for using one algorithm is that just one algorithm has to be
optimized (f.e. assembler optimized or hardware offloading). I'd like to
submit a patch for this as soon as dm-crypt is merged. Andrew: any ideas if
this will happen soon?
> At least the "cryptoloop-exploit" Jari Ruusu posted doesn't work anymore.
"""exploit""".
Best Regards,
Clemens
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-23 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 17:02 Christophe Saout
2004-02-19 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-20 17:14 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-20 18:53 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-20 19:09 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-20 19:23 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-20 21:23 ` James Morris
2004-02-20 22:40 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-21 0:07 ` James Morris
2004-02-21 2:17 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-24 19:11 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-24 19:43 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-24 20:38 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-25 21:43 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-26 19:35 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-26 20:02 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-27 16:05 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-27 18:37 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-27 20:02 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-27 20:13 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-27 20:55 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-27 21:16 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-28 0:39 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-28 13:02 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-24 22:26 ` James Morris
2004-02-24 22:31 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-24 22:45 ` James Morris
2004-02-24 20:01 ` James Morris
2004-02-24 20:24 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-25 2:25 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 3:05 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-23 0:35 ` Fruhwirth Clemens [this message]
2004-02-23 13:44 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-23 15:36 ` James Morris
[not found] <20040223214738.GD24799@certainkey.com>
[not found] ` <Xine.LNX.4.44.0402231710390.21142-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
2004-02-24 20:22 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-24 22:17 ` James Morris
2004-02-24 22:44 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 13:52 ` James Morris
2004-02-25 15:11 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040223003504.GA15110@ghanima.endorphin.org \
--to=clemens-dated-1078360505.b6b1@endorphin.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=christophe@saout.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®