mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: nfs loff_t fix not in 2.6.3?
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:42:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040223054257.GI18563@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> (raw)

I have this patch below to fix the 4GB file size limit with knfsd.  Is it
still needed (alternate fix?), and what's the status of it?

Thanks,

Mike

Return-path: <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Envelope-to: mfedyk@matchmail.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:55:00 -0800
Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.24] ident=root)
	by fileserver.matchmail.com with smtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1AqQrL-0002hF-Ca
	for mfedyk@matchmail.com; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:54:59 -0800
Received: From notabene ([129.94.211.194] == dulcimer.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU)
	(for <akpm@osdl.org>) (for <mfedyk@matchmail.com>)
	(for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>) By note With Smtp ;
	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:54:51 +1100 
Received: from neilb by notabene with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AqQqR-0002IH-00; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:54:03 +1100
From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:53:56 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16424.29172.314124.933554@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>,
    linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4.1GB limit with nfs3, 2.6 & knfsd?
In-Reply-To: message from Andrew Morton on Monday February 9
References: <20040210043926.GG18674@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com>
	<20040209215020.60cf2f93.akpm@osdl.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.3.1
X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D<ml'fY1Vw+@XfR[fRCsUoP?K6bt3YD\ui5Fh?f
	LONpR';(ql)VM_TQ/<l_^D3~B:z$\YC7gUCuC=sYm/80G=$tt"98mr8(l))QzVKCk$6~gldn~*FK9x
	8`;pM{3S8679sP+MbP,72<3_PIH-$I&iaiIb|hV1d%cYg))BmI)AZ
X-Spam-DCC: : 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	fileserver.matchmail.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.61
Content-Length: 4358

On Monday February 9, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was trying to tar and bzip2 some directories over the weekend and I think
> > I may have found a bug.
> > 
> > The operation would consistantly fail when the bzip2ed tar file hit 4.1GB
> > when directed at a 2.6.1-bk2-nfs-stale-file-handles knfsd server from
> > another computer running the same kernel.
> > 
> > If I try the operation against a local filesystem, or a 2.4.24 knfsd server
> > on the network there are no failures and the file is at 18GB and growing on
> > the local filesystem (not enough space on the 2.4 server...).
> > 
> > This is all from the same nfs client computer.
> > 
> > I plan on doing some more tests with dd and cat against the server after the
> > files have finished compressing.
> > 
> > Anyone have any ideas?  I know this could be userspace, but why does it work
> > against a 2.4 knfsd and on the local filesystem?
> 
> Yes, something funny does seem to be happening.
> 
> I have a simple NFS mount of an ext2 filesystem via localhost and a 6GB
> `dd' fails after 4G:
> 
> vmm:/mnt/localhost> strace dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M count=6000
> ...
> write(1, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1048576) = 1048576
> read(0, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1048576) = 1048576
> write(1, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1048576) = 1048576
> read(0, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1048576) = 1048576
> write(1, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1048576) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> 

This is probably fixed by the following patch that is sitting in my
queue.
While 2.4 technically needs the same patch, it isn't affected because
it completely ignores the "offset", rather than almost-completely
ignoring it.

NeilBrown

-------------------------------------------------------
off_t in nfsd_commit needs to be loff_t

From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>

While I was stress-testing NFS/XFS on 2.6.1/2.6.2-rc, I found that
sometimes my "dd" would exit with:

	#  dd if=/dev/zero bs=4096 > /mnt/file
	dd: writing `standard output': Invalid argument
	1100753+0 records in
	1100752+0 records out

After adding some debug printk's to the server and client code
and some tcpdump-ing, I found that the NFSERR_INVAL was returned by
nfsd_commit on the server.

Turns out that the "offset" argument is off_t instead of loff_t.
It isn't used at all (unfortunately), but it _is_ checked for
sanity, so that's where the error came from.

 ----------- Diffstat output ------------
 ./fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c        |    4 ++--
 ./fs/nfsd/vfs.c             |    2 +-
 ./include/linux/nfsd/nfsd.h |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff ./fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c~current~ ./fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
--- ./fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c~current~	2004-02-06 13:38:28.000000000 +1100
+++ ./fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c	2004-02-06 13:38:28.000000000 +1100
@@ -595,10 +595,10 @@ nfsd3_proc_commit(struct svc_rqst * rqst
 {
 	int	nfserr;
 
-	dprintk("nfsd: COMMIT(3)   %s %d@%ld\n",
+	dprintk("nfsd: COMMIT(3)   %s %u@%Lu\n",
 				SVCFH_fmt(&argp->fh),
 				argp->count,
-				(unsigned long) argp->offset);
+				(unsigned long long) argp->offset);
 
 	if (argp->offset > NFS_OFFSET_MAX)
 		RETURN_STATUS(nfserr_inval);

diff ./fs/nfsd/vfs.c~current~ ./fs/nfsd/vfs.c
--- ./fs/nfsd/vfs.c~current~	2004-02-06 13:38:21.000000000 +1100
+++ ./fs/nfsd/vfs.c	2004-02-06 13:38:28.000000000 +1100
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ out:
  */
 int
 nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
-               off_t offset, unsigned long count)
+               loff_t offset, unsigned long count)
 {
 	struct file	file;
 	int		err;

diff ./include/linux/nfsd/nfsd.h~current~ ./include/linux/nfsd/nfsd.h
--- ./include/linux/nfsd/nfsd.h~current~	2004-02-06 13:38:24.000000000 +1100
+++ ./include/linux/nfsd/nfsd.h	2004-02-06 13:38:28.000000000 +1100
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int		nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *, s
 				struct svc_fh *res, int createmode,
 				u32 *verifier, int *truncp);
 int		nfsd_commit(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
-				off_t, unsigned long);
+				loff_t, unsigned long);
 #endif /* CONFIG_NFSD_V3 */
 int		nfsd_open(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *, int,
 				int, struct file *);


             reply	other threads:[~2004-02-23  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-23  5:42 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-02-23  5:51 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-02-23  6:01   ` Mike Fedyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040223054257.GI18563@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®