From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261827AbUBWGAT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:00:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261832AbUBWGAT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:00:19 -0500 Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net ([151.164.30.28]:53462 "EHLO mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261827AbUBWGAO (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:00:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:59:52 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Gordon Stanton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: large built-in.o Message-ID: <20040223055952.GJ18563@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Gordon Stanton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040223055328.D70BB23947@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040223055328.D70BB23947@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:53:28PM +0800, Gordon Stanton wrote: > Hi, > Just a quick question. I was building 2.6.3 with allyesconfig and I noticed it was making many built-in.o files around the place. These are quite large object files > Eg. in fs is > 74992735 Feb 23 15:35 built-in.o > 74Meg for the filesystems code and thats with even the individual .o files compiled with -Os > > I haven't noticed this happening before. Is it new for 2.6.x? Turn off CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO