From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261904AbUBWOlx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:41:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261876AbUBWOlx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:41:53 -0500 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([212.16.62.51]:50050 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261904AbUBWOlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:41:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:49 +0100 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Paul Mundt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Kegel , Sean McGoogan Subject: Re: Kernel Cross Compiling [update] Message-ID: <20040223144149.GC4092@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Mundt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Kegel , Sean McGoogan References: <20040222035350.GB31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040222155209.GA11162@linux-sh.org> <20040222170720.GA24703@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040222172307.GB11162@linux-sh.org> <20040223132819.GB16667@malvern.uk.w2k.superh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040223132819.GB16667@malvern.uk.w2k.superh.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:28:19PM +0000, Richard Curnow wrote: > * Paul Mundt [2004-02-23]: > > > is there a toolchain/binutils which 'know' and 'support' > > > the '-isa=sh64' option? maybe it was depreciated? > > > > > I don't know of one out in the wild. SuperH has their own toolchains that > > support this, and is what I currently use. I'm not sure what the status of > > their patches are in relation to getting merged into current gcc/binutils. > > Richard (CC'ed) might know though, Richard? > > The last public release we made of the SH-5 tools is available at > > ftp://ftp.uk.superh.com/pub/SuperH-GNU/Barcelona-20030414 how are they related to the 'mainline' toolchain? i.e. is this something completely separate, or do you follow the binutils/gcc updates from time to time? what would be the binutils/gcc version which is 'closest' to 'your' toolchain? wouldn't it make sense to get those changes back into the mainline? > This URL provides further information: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1984379&forum_id=9482 > > The SH-5 tools we're currently using in-house are a few months more > advanced than those. (They date from about August 2003.) We'd be happy > to package this version up and make it available if people express > interest in this. sure I'm interested *expressing interest* thanks for the info, TIA, Herbert > BTW, if anyone who's using the 2003_04_14 release has found any > problems, please do let me know and I'll pass the information on to the > toolchain guys. > > -- > Richard \\\ SH-4/SH-5 Core & Debug Architect > Curnow \\\ SuperH (UK) Ltd, Bristol > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/