From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261997AbUBWS4u (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:56:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261999AbUBWS4t (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:56:49 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:60175 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261997AbUBWS4s (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:56:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:56:41 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linus Torvalds , Herbert Poetzl , Mikael Pettersson , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64 Message-ID: <20040223185641.A12585@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Herbert Poetzl , Mikael Pettersson , Kernel Mailing List References: <16435.14044.182718.134404@alkaid.it.uu.se> <20040222025957.GA31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040223170336.GK5499@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040223170336.GK5499@fs.tum.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:03:36PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > In the long term, x86_64 creates more confusion: > - SuSE says AMD64 [1] > - RedHat says AMD64 [2] Not the rpm architecture, though :) Maybe they also say IPF for ia64?