From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262500AbUBXW2f (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:28:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262506AbUBXW2f (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:28:35 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:44213 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262500AbUBXW2b (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:28:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:30:25 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Fedyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.3-mm3 Message-Id: <20040224143025.36395730.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <403BCE9E.7080607@matchmail.com> References: <20040222172200.1d6bdfae.akpm@osdl.org> <403BCE9E.7080607@matchmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Fedyk wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.3/2.6.3-mm3/ > > Hi, > > I have 2.6.3 on the 1.5GB RAM server that started the "large slab" thread. > > Which patches should I apply from -mm to test for improvements? Just apply the mm3 rollup patch. > Do these below have any dependencies not listed? Probably not. If they apply ten they'll work. > What about Nick's fix up patch for the two patches above? Should I > include that one also? yes.