From: cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org
Subject: reaim - 2.6.3-mm1 IO performance down.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:20:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040224162052.33895550.cliffw@osdl.org> (raw)
Running the reaim 'new_fserver' workload, we now see a performance drop
on 2.6.3-mm1, ext3 filesystem
Kernel JPM Max Users Percent change
inux-2.6.3 10347.87 172 0.0
2.6.3-rc3-mm1 9826.35 164 -5.07
2.6.3-mm1 8938.17 140 (run 1) -13.65
2.6.3-mm1 9100.39 136 (run 2)-12.08
I have done some comparions graphs here, with readprofile data:
http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/compares/r_comp/2.6.3_vs_mm1_r1/index.html
http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/compares/r_comp/2.6.3_vs_mm1_r2/index.html
The interesting graph is the bottom one on the page, comparing client
run-time to number of children. The -mm1 kernel has a spike in run time, becoming
very noticealbe around 60-80 lusers.
kernel Users JPM Run Time
linux-2.6.3 60 10327.87 34.16 seconds
2.6.3-mm1 60 8279.75 42.61 seconds
Linux-2.6.3 80 10275.23 45.78 seconds
2.6.3-mm1 80 7841.31 59.99 seconds
For the same test on the same machine, results from 2.6.2-rc1-mm2 and 2.6.2-rc3-mm1
were within 1.0% of the linux-2.6.2 runs. So this is new.
More data and tests if requested - are there some patch sets we should try reverting?
cliffw
--
The church is near, but the road is icy.
The bar is far, but i will walk carefully. - Russian proverb
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 0:20 cliff white [this message]
2004-02-25 1:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 17:40 ` Cliff White
2004-02-25 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 20:52 ` Cliff White
2004-02-25 23:36 ` Cliff White
2004-02-25 2:00 Con Kolivas
2004-02-25 3:31 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040224162052.33895550.cliffw@osdl.org \
--to=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®