From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261287AbUBYUC5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:02:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261431AbUBYUC5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:02:57 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:59356 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261287AbUBYUCx (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:02:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:02:56 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Corey Minyard Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPMI driver updates, part 1b Message-Id: <20040225120256.10220f07.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <403CC667.2000403@acm.org> References: <403B57B8.2000008@acm.org> <403BE39D.2080207@acm.org> <20040224170024.4e75a85c.akpm@osdl.org> <403CC667.2000403@acm.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Corey Minyard wrote: > > > > >- We have #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS code in there? > > > Well, yes. That's so if people add the high-res timer patch, this > driver can take advantage of it. Is that a problem? Generally we prefer to not carry such code in the kernel tree. But it's relatively localised and not in a place where a lot of people go. If it makes your life easier and is actually maintained it is hardly the end of the world.