From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261524AbUBYSQY (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:16:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261520AbUBYSOI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:14:08 -0500 Received: from gprs151-5.eurotel.cz ([160.218.151.5]:6019 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261518AbUBYSNp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:13:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:13:28 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: LKML , LM Sensors Cc: Greg KH Subject: Re: [RFC 2.6] sensor chips sysfs interface change (long) Message-ID: <20040225181328.GE1214@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040218220845.361341c9.khali@linux-fr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040218220845.361341c9.khali@linux-fr.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > 1* Change the base scheme (e.g. temp_min1 -> temp1_min). This is the > more important change (in the sense it affects all drivers and the > libsensors library) and correspond to the second problem listed above. > For those interested, the original thread on the lm_sensors mailing-list > is available here: > http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg06206.html > And an older one on the same topic: > http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg05028.html > > Comments welcome (or even requested, according to the subject line). Sounds good, what you probably need is to submit patch doing step #1 to Andrew and see what happens... Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]