From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262638AbUBZDL3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:11:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262621AbUBZDL2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:11:28 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:22702 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262638AbUBZDLQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:11:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:11:40 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk Cc: bgerst@didntduck.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up sys_ioperm stubs Message-Id: <20040225191140.36288919.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040226030523.GE31035@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <403D5F32.4080805@quark.didntduck.org> <20040226030523.GE31035@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:51:30PM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote: > > Remove stubs for sys_ioperm for non-x86 arches, using sys_ni_syscall > > instead where applicable. > > I have better suggestion: make sys_ioperm() a cond_syscall(). Then kill > its implementation on all platforms where it just returns -ENOSYS. Why is that better? Sticking a pointer to the not-implemented-syscall into the syscall table is pretty darn explicit.