From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Cc: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
KGDB bugreports <kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] Re: kgdb: rename i386-stub.c to kgdb.c
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:25:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040225212515.GE1307@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403D10DB.8060506@mvista.com>
Hi!
> >>>kgdb uses really confusing names for arch-dependend parts. This fixes
> >>>it. Okay to commit?
> >>
> >>Why is arch/$x/kernel/$x-stub.c confusing? The name $x-stub.c is
> >>indicative of architecture dependent code in it. Err, well so is the path.
> >
> >
> >
> >Well, looking at i386-stub.c, how do you know it is kgdb-related?
> >
> >
> >>PPC and sparc stubs in present vanilla kernel use this naming convention.
> >>That's why I adopted it.
> >>
> >>I find kernel/kgdbstub.c, arch/$x/kernel/$x-stub.c more consistent
> >>compared to kernel/kgdbstub.c, arch/$x/kernel/kgdb.c
> >
> >
> >I actually made it kernel/kgdb.c and arch/*/kernel/kgdb.c. I believe
> >there's no point where one could be confused....
>
> gdb itself gets confused with this. Try, for example, time.c which, on the
> x86, is in both arch and common code. I use emacs with kgdb and it gets
> confused when I point at a location in the source and tell it to set a
> break point.
That's a gdb bug, surely?
My gdb seems to work okay:
(gdb) b time.c:3
Breakpoint 1 at 0xc01e8b30: file fs/ntfs/time.c, line 3.
(gdb) b kernel/time.c:3
Breakpoint 2 at 0xc0122540: file kernel/time.c, line 3.
(gdb)
....that seems more or less right.
> Please, lets have only one of each name.
You can't have that, anyway.. Filenames are already repeating.
Well, I already commited it. It is possible to revert last change, and
we'll get kernel/kgdbstub.c but arch/*/kernel/kgdb.c.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-24 13:06 Pavel Machek
2004-02-25 7:33 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-25 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-25 10:59 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-25 11:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-25 11:23 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-25 21:17 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " George Anzinger
2004-02-25 21:25 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-02-25 21:28 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-25 22:31 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-26 4:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 23:07 ` George Anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040225212515.GE1307@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®