From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262823AbUBZRCG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:02:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261579AbUBZRCG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:02:06 -0500 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:26375 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262825AbUBZRBy (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:01:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:53:18 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Richard B. Johnson" Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG][2.4] /proc/kcore is a random generator ? Message-ID: <20040226165318.GA4377@alpha.home.local> References: <200402181337.i1IDbsXU010467@hera.kernel.org> <20040226161637.GA4201@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:50:27AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > Well with 'older' utilities on 2.4.24, I always get '0' with `du`! that's what I've always been used to, too. I noticed it first because a classical "du -sc /" was 500 MB bigger than it ought to be. > Probably moon-phase. I didn't think about this, but you may be right :-) Cheers, Willy