From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263048AbUB0Q4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:56:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263049AbUB0Q4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:56:38 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:31113 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263048AbUB0Q4h (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:56:37 -0500 Message-Id: <200402271656.i1RGuME16838@mail.osdl.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:56:17 -0800 (PST) From: markw@osdl.org Subject: Re: AS performance with reiser4 on 2.6.3 To: Nikita@Namesys.COM cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, reiserfs-list@Namesys.COM, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <16446.13520.5837.193556@laputa.namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26 Feb, Nikita Danilov wrote: > markw@osdl.org writes: > > Hi Nick, > > > > I started getting some results with dbt-2 on 2.6.3 and saw that reiser4 > > is doing a bit worse with the AS elevator. Although reiser4 wasn't > > doing well to begin with, compared to the other filesystems. I have > > links to the STP results on our 4-ways and 8-ways here: > > http://developer.osdl.org/markw/fs/dbt2_stp_results.html > > There were no changes between 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 that could affect reiser4 > performance, so it is not clear why numbers are so different. Probably > results should be averaged over several runs. Also can you run test with > > http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.02.25/extra/e_05-proc-sleep.patch > > applied? To use it turn CONFIG_PROC_SLEEP on (depends on > CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER), and do "cat /proc/sleep" before and after test > run. http://khack.osdl.org/stp/288905/results/ There are a set of /proc/sleep files there from a 4-way system. Mark