From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263083AbUB0SFj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:05:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263092AbUB0SFj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:05:39 -0500 Received: from [66.35.79.110] ([66.35.79.110]:8838 "EHLO www.hockin.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263083AbUB0SFg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:05:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:05:16 -0800 From: Tim Hockin To: Grigor Gatchev Cc: Mike Fedyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal Message-ID: <20040227180516.GA18605@hockin.org> References: <403E47B4.8080507@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:18:12PM +0200, Grigor Gatchev wrote: > As for directions and adding code: Nobody ever, AFAIK, has intentionally > pushed the kernel towards this layered model. And the kernel source is > already structured in a way convenient to go with it, and for the last > three years was going exactly in this direction! That is why it seems > to me that this is the internal logic of the kernel development. See STREAMS and how well it worked.