From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263009AbUB0UHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:07:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263010AbUB0UHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:07:51 -0500 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:4282 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263009AbUB0UHa (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:07:30 -0500 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Errors on 2th ide channel of promise ultra100 tx2 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:14:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: John Bradford , Erik van Engelen , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <403F2178.70806@vanE.nl> <1077908499.29713.19.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1077908499.29713.19.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402272114.23108.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 27 of February 2004 20:01, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2004-02-27 at 19:30, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Haven't got a clue about these "status=0x51" and "error=0x04". > > > > Anyone? > > > > > > Basically, the errors mean what they say - the drive is in an error > > > state, (received an unrecognised command), but is ready for further > > > operation. > > > > Received an unrecognised command from the kernel? What can cause that? > > Our early setup/probing code in 2.4.x at least may send stuff that very > very old disks don't understand. Its arguably a bug in the ident parsing > but it shouldnt ever be harmful ide-disk.c sends WIN_READ_NATIVE_MAX_{EXT} without checking if HPA feature set is supported, this is fixed in 2.6.x for a long time. We need 2.4<->2.6 IDE sync monkey... a really smart one... Cheers, Bartlomiej