From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Worrisome IDE PIO transfers...
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402290121.30498.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4041232C.7030305@pobox.com>
[ Geert added to cc: ]
On Sunday 29 of February 2004 00:24, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Looking at the function that is used to transfer data when in PIO mode...
>
> void taskfile_output_data (ide_drive_t *drive, void *buffer, u32 wcount)
> {
> if (drive->bswap) {
> ata_bswap_data(buffer, wcount);
> HWIF(drive)->ata_output_data(drive, buffer, wcount);
> ata_bswap_data(buffer, wcount);
> } else {
> HWIF(drive)->ata_output_data(drive, buffer, wcount);
> }
> }
>
> Swapping the data in-place is very, very wrong... you don't want to be
> touching the data that userspace might have mmap'd ... Additionally,
> byteswapping back and forth for each PIO sector chews unnecessary CPU.
This is used for accessing "normal" disks on beasts with byte-swapped IDE
bus (Atari/Q40/TiVo) and "byteswapped" disks on normal machines.
[ Hm. actually I don't see how it can be used for accessing "normal" disks,
as data is byteswapped by IDE bus and then swapped back by IDE driver. ]
Manfred noticed the same issue some time ago:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0201.0/0768.html
but discussion ended without final conclusion.
I like Alan's idea to use loopback instead of "bswap".
> Seems to me the architecture's OUTS[WL] hook (or a new, similar hook)
> that swaps as it writes would be _much_ preferred, and eliminate this
> possible data corruption issue.
I think something similar has been already done
(grep for insw_swapw/outsw_swapw in ide-iops.c and asm-m68k/ide.h).
Bartlomiej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-29 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 23:24 Jeff Garzik
2004-02-29 0:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2004-02-29 0:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-29 3:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-29 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-29 19:23 ` Richard Zidlicky
2004-02-29 20:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-01 10:43 ` Richard Zidlicky
2004-02-29 1:50 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-29 2:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-29 3:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-29 9:32 ` Aubin LaBrosse
2004-03-01 0:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-01 13:23 ` Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 16:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-29 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-29 14:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402290121.30498.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®