From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262187AbUB2Xvy (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:51:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262189AbUB2Xvy (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:51:54 -0500 Received: from mail.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:31442 "EHLO mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262187AbUB2Xvx (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:51:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 00:51:50 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Linux-Kernel mailing list Cc: Linus Torvalds Subject: Is the 2.6 dependency information complete? Doesn't look so... Message-ID: <20040229235150.GA6327@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Linux-Kernel mailing list , Linus Torvalds Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've just seen, after a BK pull: CC fs/nfsd/nfsctl.o fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:28:30: linux/nfsd_idmap.h: no such file or directory This is a hint the dependency information isn't complete, otherwise, GNU make would've "get"^Wgot the include file. Will the kernel rebuild dependent files when includes change when this information is missing? If so, how? TIA, -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95