From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261321AbUCAPWy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:22:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261324AbUCAPWx (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:22:53 -0500 Received: from shark.pro-futura.com ([161.58.178.219]:50348 "EHLO shark.pro-futura.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261321AbUCAPWw (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:22:52 -0500 From: "Tvrtko A. =?iso-8859-2?q?Ur=B9ulin?=" Organization: Croadria Internet usluge To: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Known problems with megaraid under 2.4.25 highmem? Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:25:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atul Mukker References: <200402271107.42050.tvrtko@croadria.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403011625.37224.tvrtko@croadria.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Not known to me... > > Can you get any traces from the lockup? NMI watchdog or sysrq+p and +t? > > Did any previous 2.4.x work reliably? I can confirm that it is not highmem related because today we had the same lockup on 2.4.25 wo/highmem. Only thing left to be ruled out is grsec patch. It will be tested soon and then I will inform you. What is the status of megaraid2 driver? Is it safe to use it in production or that isn't recommended?