mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nuno Monteiro <nuno@itsari.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: something funny about tty's on 2.6.4-rc1-mm1
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:45:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040301184512.GA21285@hobbes.itsari.int> (raw)


Hi all,

I just took 2.6.4-rc1-mm1 for a spin, and there's definitely something  
funny about tty's. I left the computer unattended and had visitors over,  
among them small children who, apparently, decided I needed 350 aterm's  
open ;-). So, after they left I issued a 'killall -9 aterm' and fired up  
a new one, and here's something definitely interesting:

nuno@hobbes:~$ w
 18:33:56 up  4:08, 157 users,  load average: 0.03, 0.89, 1.51
USER     TTY        LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
nuno     :0        14:26   ?xdm?   3:55   0.95s gnome-session
nuno     pts/358   18:30    0.00s  0.10s  0.00s w


I know for a fact that I don't have 157 logged in users (well, there's  
only 45 processes running right now), and shouldn't pts' be recycled, and  
a lower number be assigned? The last kernel I ran was 2.6.3, and none of  
this happened.

My config is:

CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS=y
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=y
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT=512

and this is a plain jane static /dev -- not devfs nor udev. Despite the  
supposedly 157 users logged in, /dev/pts only contains '358', which is  
the one allocated to this instance of aterm right now.

nuno@hobbes:~$ ls -l /dev/pts
total 0
crw--w----    1 nuno     users    136, 102 Mar  1 18:41 358

In the mean time I'll fall back to 2.6.3.


Regards,


		Nuno


             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-01 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-01 18:45 Nuno Monteiro [this message]
2004-03-01 19:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-02  5:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-02 14:52   ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2004-03-02 15:02     ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-02 17:47       ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2004-03-02 16:54     ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-02 22:08       ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-03  2:29         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-02 19:04 Albert Cahalan
2004-03-02 19:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-02 22:46 ` Edgar Toernig
2004-03-02 23:59   ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-03  4:12 Albert Cahalan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040301184512.GA21285@hobbes.itsari.int \
    --to=nuno@itsari.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®