From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Daniel McNeil <daniel@osdl.org>
Cc: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@gmx.at>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: AIO Oops on 2.6.3-mm3
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:09:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403021109.03994.pbadari@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1078253824.3632.4.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net>
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 10:57 am, Daniel McNeil wrote:
> I fixed reference counting when the i/o completed before the
> submit path was done referencing the iocb. This looks
> similar except it is getting a fault.
I wonder whats different here. Even in this case, IO did complete
with EFAULT.
Just for argument, if the IO completed correctly (without errors) -
how would it not run into this ? io_submit_one() will call
aio_complete() is the return code is NOT -EIOCBQUEUED.
Isn't it ? How do we prevent calling aio_complete() twice ?
Thanks,
Badari
> > I found the problem.. But no fix yet !!
> >
> > Here is whats happening..
> >
> > io_submit_one() :
> >
> > gets iocb with 2 refs
> > calls file->f_op->aio_write() which returns EFAULT...
> > This calls aio_complete() with EFAULT. aio_complete() drops a ref.
> > calls aio_put_req() which drops a ref - since the count is
> > zero it frees iocb.
> > Since we got EFAULT, io_submit_one() calls aio_complete()
> > with freed up iocb - so we get OOPS.
> >
> > The problem here is we are calling aio_complete() twice.
> >
> > Daneil, didn't you fix this earlier ?
> >
> > int io_submit_one(struct kioctx *ctx, struct iocb __user *user_iocb,
> > {
> >
> > ...
> > req = aio_get_req(ctx); /* returns with 2 references to req */
> > ..
> > case IOCB_CMD_PWRITE:
> > ...
> > ret = file->f_op->aio_write(req, buf,
> > iocb->aio_nbytes, req->ki_pos);
> > ...
> > aio_put_req(req); /* drop extra ref to req */
> > if (likely(-EIOCBQUEUED == ret))
> > return 0;
> > aio_complete(req, ret, 0); /* will drop i/o ref to req */
> > return 0;
> > ....
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Badari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-02 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 2:48 Tobias Diedrich
2004-03-02 17:54 ` Badari Pulavarty
2004-03-02 18:57 ` Daniel McNeil
2004-03-02 19:09 ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2004-03-05 1:31 ` [PATCH 2.6.3-mm4] direct_io_worker-aio_complete patch (fixes AIO Oops) Daniel McNeil
2004-03-05 15:39 ` Tobias Diedrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403021109.03994.pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-aio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ranma@gmx.at \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®