From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-cpu blk_plug_list
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:54:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040303015448.749a87d2.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040303094509.GA8779@cistron.nl>
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
>
> According to Andrew Morton:
> > And also having looked at Miquel's (currently slightly defective)
> > implementation of the any_congested() API for devicemapper:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.4-rc1/2.6.4-rc1-mm1/broken-out/queue-congestion-dm-implementation.patch
> >
> > I am thinking that an appropriate way of solving the blk_run_queues() lock
> > contention problem is to nuke the global plug list altogther and make the
> > unplug function a method in struct backing_device_info.
> >
> > This is conceptually the appropriate place to put it - it is almost always
> > the case that when we run blk_run_queues() it is on behalf of an
> > address_space, and the few remaining case can be simply deleted -
> > mm/mempool.c is the last one I think.
> >
> > The implementation of backing_dev_info.unplug() would have to run the
> > unplug_fn of every queue which contributes to the top-level queue (the
> > thing which the address_space is sitting on top of).
>
> But then you need a pointer to the queue. In that case,
> you might as well put the congested_fn pointer in the request_queue
> too.
It already is. backing_dev_info is a member of struct request_queue.
> Then you get something like
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2004-February/msg00203.html
> (though I'd replace "rw" with "bdi_bits" like in the current patch).
Sure. This is all nice and simple stuff, except for the locking, which
needs serious work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-03 4:20 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-03 5:13 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-03 9:45 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-03 9:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-03-03 16:24 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-03 22:37 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-01 22:28 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-01 22:14 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-01 21:18 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-01 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-01 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-01 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB501F2AB4C@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-03-01 22:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-03 3:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-03 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] <cistron.B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB50211E5C8@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040303015448.749a87d2.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®