mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-cpu blk_plug_list
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:54:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040303015448.749a87d2.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040303094509.GA8779@cistron.nl>

Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
>
> According to Andrew Morton:
>  >  And also having looked at Miquel's (currently slightly defective)
>  >  implementation of the any_congested() API for devicemapper:
>  > 
>  >  ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.4-rc1/2.6.4-rc1-mm1/broken-out/queue-congestion-dm-implementation.patch
>  > 
>  >  I am thinking that an appropriate way of solving the blk_run_queues() lock
>  >  contention problem is to nuke the global plug list altogther and make the
>  >  unplug function a method in struct backing_device_info.
>  > 
>  >  This is conceptually the appropriate place to put it - it is almost always
>  >  the case that when we run blk_run_queues() it is on behalf of an
>  >  address_space, and the few remaining case can be simply deleted -
>  >  mm/mempool.c is the last one I think.
>  > 
>  >  The implementation of backing_dev_info.unplug() would have to run the
>  >  unplug_fn of every queue which contributes to the top-level queue (the
>  >  thing which the address_space is sitting on top of).
> 
>  But then you need a pointer to the queue. In that case,
>  you might as well put the congested_fn pointer in the request_queue
>  too.

It already is.  backing_dev_info is a member of struct request_queue.

> Then you get something like
>  https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2004-February/msg00203.html
>  (though I'd replace "rw" with "bdi_bits" like in the current patch).

Sure.  This is all nice and simple stuff, except for the locking, which
needs serious work.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-03  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-03  4:20 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-03  5:13 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-03  9:45   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-03  9:54     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-03-03 16:24       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-03 22:37         ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-01 22:28 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-01 22:14 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-01 21:18 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-01 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-01 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-01 22:31   ` Andrew Morton
     [not found] ` <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB501F2AB4C@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-03-01 22:36   ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-03  3:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-03-03  3:55   ` Andrew Morton
     [not found] <cistron.B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB50211E5C8@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040303015448.749a87d2.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®