From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261170AbUCCWHD (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:07:03 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261181AbUCCWHD
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:07:03 -0500
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:43965 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261170AbUCCWHA
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:07:00 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:06:58 +0000
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: udev versus parallel-port Zip drive
Message-ID: <20040303220658.GU16357@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <40465460.1050600@myrealbox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40465460.1050600@myrealbox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:55:44PM -0800, walt wrote:
 
> My question, I suppose, is:  what are the chances that a
> parallel-port device can be automatically detected

0