mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Thomas Horsten <thomas@horsten.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, <andre@linux-ide.org>,
	<arjanv@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.x Linux Medley RAID Version 7
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:14:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403102314.18449.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0403101917170.2582-100000@jehova.dsm.dk>

On Wednesday 10 of March 2004 21:11, Thomas Horsten wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Patch for inclusion should have this cleaned up.
>
> I have cleaned up the code according to your and Christoph's comments +
> CodingStyle (and some other cleanups now I was at it).

Ok, thanks.

> > The similar thing here - ie. I would like to replug drives to on-board
> > Intel. When Linux is driving RAID purely in software it shouldn't matter
> > what controller we are using.
>
> I have not changed this. There is simply no reliable way to detect the
> Medley superblock without comparing these magic words with the PCI values.

There is still a checksum.

> My Medley solution for 2.6 will be completely userspace (using dm), and
> there it will be possible to "force detect" an array with non-matching PCI
> ID by passing the devices as command line arguments, unfortunately it's
> not that easy in 2.4 (the whole ataraid is a hack anyway, but a useful one
> until something better is in place).

Yep, device-mapper is the way to go.

> Patch below.

I will submit it to Marcelo soon...

Regards,
Bartlomiej


      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-10 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-10 13:07 Thomas Horsten
2004-03-10 14:39 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-10 15:19   ` Thomas Horsten
2004-03-10 16:07     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-03-10 16:29       ` Thomas Horsten
2004-03-10 16:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-10 20:11       ` Thomas Horsten
2004-03-10 20:49         ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-10 20:56           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-10 22:14         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200403102314.18449.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas@horsten.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®