On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:42:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 11:11:50AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 10:48, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > But then the removal of KERNEL_SYSCALLS becomes hostage to those drivers, > > > and nobody is working on them. It'll never happen. > > > > CONFIG_BROKEN ?? > > These are working drivers, and it's a stable kernel series... for some value of working... I mean, I'm not convinced the code is actually secure (what if the fd they use is shared via a thread and userland is mucking about with that fd to do funky stuff ???)