From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263169AbUCMTXG (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:23:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263174AbUCMTXG (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:23:06 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:47830 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263169AbUCMTXE (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:23:04 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:36:21 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , torvalds@transmeta.com, Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: Dealing with swsusp vs. pmdisk Message-ID: <20040313123620.GA3352@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20040312224645.GA326@elf.ucw.cz> <20040313004756.GB5115@thunk.org> <1079146273.1967.63.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1079146273.1967.63.camel@gaston> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Pavel, what do you think of the swsusp2 patch, BTW? My biggest > > complaint about it is that since it's maintained outside of the > > kernel, it's constantly behind about 0.75 revisions behind the latest > > 2.6 release. The feature set of swsusp2, if they can ever get it > > completely bugfree(tm) is certainly impressive. > > I'd like it to be merged upstream too. Are we talking 2.6 or 2.7 here? -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms