From: Sasa U <sasa@kcore.ath.cx>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6 I/O problem ?
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:27:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040313232753.63fad84e.sasa@kcore.ath.cx> (raw)
Hello,
I noticed that 2.6 kernel branch, have some problem with disk read/writes.
Today I talked a little with some of my friends, and they say that they don't have that problem, and that 2.6 I/O is acctualy faster than on 2.4 kernel version.
However, I did some kind of "tests" on both, 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, with hdparm(-t,-T) and dd(disk writes), and the results is what I expected to be ... 2.4 is faster than 2.6, but, I know that is not the best way to test these kind of things, so I was wondering, is there any "offical" words on this ? Tests ?
I supose ther are more people with this kind of problem(i talked to some of them on irc.freenode.net, #kernel and some of them said that have same problem).
Kind Regards,
S
reply other threads:[~2004-03-13 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040313232753.63fad84e.sasa@kcore.ath.cx \
--to=sasa@kcore.ath.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®