mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dynamic sched timeslices
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:40:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040315154042.40c58c5b.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040315230950.GB4452@tpkurt.garloff.de>

Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > I remember we had a more complete patch to allow tuning the scheduler
> > through sysctls in -mm once, though.  Questions is why that one wasn't
> > merged and if the same reasons apply to a 'light' version.
> 
> Hmm, I fail to remember unfortunately. Probably it had too many knobs.
> Andrew?

It had a zillion knobs, and was mainly for developers.

Your patch didn't come with any subjective or measured testing results.  In
theory, the scheduler should magically tune itself to the current workload.
If your patch is indeed necessary then this may point at a bug in the
current CPU scheduler.

Please tell us more...

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-15 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-15 22:42 Kurt Garloff
2004-03-15 22:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-15 23:09   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-15 23:40     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-03-16 11:36       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-16 13:13         ` Con Kolivas
2004-03-16 14:29           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-16 20:45             ` Con Kolivas
2004-03-18  0:20               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-18  0:32                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18  3:38                   ` Con Kolivas
2004-03-16 15:03 ` Timothy Miller
2004-03-16 15:08   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-23  9:23 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040315154042.40c58c5b.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=garloff@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®