From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261551AbUCQRgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:36:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261716AbUCQRgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:36:09 -0500 Received: from web9706.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.241]:35214 "HELO web9706.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261551AbUCQRgI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:36:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20040317173607.31415.qmail@web9706.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:36:07 -0800 (PST) From: Alok Mooley Subject: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea? To: linux-kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have implemented a memory defragmentation utility for linux kernel 2.6 based on the paper by Mr. Daniel Phillips. Can this utility be used instead of the bigphysarea patch, for requirements less than MAX_ORDER of allocation ? Can the people using the bigphysarea patch kindly provide me with their respective memory requirements. Alok. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com