From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262215AbUCSDRs (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:17:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262274AbUCSDRs (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:17:48 -0500 Received: from web9701.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.137]:39447 "HELO web9701.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262215AbUCSDRq (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:17:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20040319031745.24951.qmail@web9701.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:17:45 -0800 (PST) From: Alok Mooley Subject: Re: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea? To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel , vijay agashe In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Alok Mooley wrote: > > > I have implemented a memory defragmentation > utility > > for linux kernel 2.6 based on the paper by Mr. > Daniel > > Phillips. > > That's very interesting, but: > 1) what is your name, "Alok Mooley" or "Vijay > Agashe" ? ;) We both are part of a project group of 4 students. We both had posted separate mails because one was rejected due to the mail being in html (or so the person at linux-kernel said). > 2) could we please see your code, so we can try to > answer > your questions ? > > > Can this utility be used instead of the > bigphysarea > > patch, for requirements less than MAX_ORDER of > > allocation ? > > This question is really hard to answer without > seeing the > code. The code will be posted by this month end. -Alok __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com