From: Richard Browning <richard@redline.org.uk>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ANYONE? Re: SMP + Hyperthreading / Asus PCDL Deluxe / Kernel 2.4.x 2.6.x / Crash/Freeze
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:57:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403211457.42738.richard@redline.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0403210940380.11483@chaos>
On Sunday 21 March 2004 14:46, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> I have been using 2.4.24 with SMP and hyperthreading with no
> problems. FYI, the reference to Windows is useless, because
> M$ was unable to make any SMP stuff function without crashes
> since windows 2000/professional, later Windows versions don't
> use your additional CPUs at all, they just report that they
> exist. FYI, see if you can find your CPU resources at all
> in XP!!! They just don't want you to know!
Er, sorry old man, but WindozeXPPro certainly does use the extra processors
with HT. I'm not talking about Task Manager (which of course shows four
processors) but the multi-threaded secure gateway application I'm developing
confirms the multiple (and virtual) processors.
In fact, Windoze2kPro has a different threading kernel to WIndozeXPPro, which
is why you get four procs in XPPro and only two in 2kPro. Anyway, this isn't
the thread or forum for this topic. I don't use Doze for anything other than
compatibility testing so it's a (fairly) moot point. I'm only interested in
improving Linux (since I develop on and for it) and if this investigation
helps, then marvellous.
Cheers
R
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-21 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615F4B99@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-03-11 6:50 ` Len Brown
2004-03-11 13:38 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-11 18:19 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-11 22:17 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-12 0:22 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-12 0:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-12 0:42 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-12 6:27 ` Len Brown
2004-03-12 7:07 ` Len Brown
2004-03-12 8:24 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-18 3:01 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-20 14:33 ` ANYONE? " Richard Browning
2004-03-20 17:26 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-20 21:30 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-03-21 3:41 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-21 3:33 ` Horst von Brand
2004-03-21 20:32 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-21 23:33 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-03-22 1:04 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-22 7:25 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-03-24 4:01 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-24 7:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
[not found] ` <1080214330.982.10.camel@sven>
[not found] ` <200403251304.56877.richard@redline.org.uk>
2004-03-25 22:47 ` Sven Dowideit
2004-03-26 0:36 ` Richard Browning
2004-03-21 14:46 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-21 14:57 ` Richard Browning [this message]
2004-03-12 1:16 ` Richard Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403211457.42738.richard@redline.org.uk \
--to=richard@redline.org.uk \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®