From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261440AbUCZXcG (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:32:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261433AbUCZXcG (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:32:06 -0500 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:56808 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261457AbUCZXcC (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:32:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:29:27 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: "David S. Miller" Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com, akpm@osdl.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, wli@holomorphy.com Subject: Re: Sparc64, cpumask_t and struct arguments (was: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT) Message-Id: <20040326152927.5992b011.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040326145423.74c1ce52.davem@redhat.com> References: <20040320031843.GY2045@holomorphy.com> <20040320000235.5e72040a.pj@sgi.com> <20040320111340.GA2045@holomorphy.com> <20040322171243.070774e5.pj@sgi.com> <20040323020940.GV2045@holomorphy.com> <20040322183918.5e0f17c7.pj@sgi.com> <20040323031345.GY2045@holomorphy.com> <20040322193628.4278db8c.pj@sgi.com> <20040323035921.GZ2045@holomorphy.com> <20040325012457.51f708c7.pj@sgi.com> <20040325101827.GO791@holomorphy.com> <20040326143648.5be0e221.pj@sgi.com> <20040326145423.74c1ce52.davem@redhat.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's a problem moreso on sparc32. Ah good. Then, since arch/sparc and include/asm-sparc make no use of cpumask_t, can I therefore conclude that you don't care whether it's really a struct, or not? That would be good news, if so. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373