From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261875AbUCaJQA (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:16:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261879AbUCaJQA (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:16:00 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:51410 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261875AbUCaJP4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:15:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:11:24 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Suspend development list Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] [PATCH 2.6]: suspend to disk only available if non-modular IDE Message-ID: <20040330201123.GE3084@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <200403282136.55435.arekm@pld-linux.org> <1080517040.2223.3.camel@laptop-linux.wpcb.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1080517040.2223.3.camel@laptop-linux.wpcb.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Applied to 2.4 and 2.6. Bad idea. For swsusp2 the patch is bad because it can resume from after initrd (IIRC). For swsusp1 patch is bad because it should be able to resume from usb mass storage drive. Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms