From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262784AbUDAIuW (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:50:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262791AbUDAIuW (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:50:22 -0500 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:53120 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262784AbUDAIuS (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:50:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:49:00 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: Paul Jackson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com, akpm@osdl.org, wli@holomorphy.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, colpatch@us.ibm.com, Hariprasad Nellitheertha Subject: Re: [PATCH] mask ADT: simplify a couple cpumask uses [8/22] Message-Id: <20040401004900.1ba8c532.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040329041315.765d4dd2.pj@sgi.com> References: <20040329041315.765d4dd2.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm going to drop the cpumask_t refinements in this Patch to the files: arch/i386/kernel/smp.c arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c A gentleman named "Hari" (Hariprasad Nellitheertha ) on the thread "BUG_ON(!cpus_equal(cpumask, tmp));" is working more essential changes to these same lines. No sense my colliding with him; and if his changes go in, mine are no longer relevant. So I will clear the path for his work. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373