From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262917AbUDEQXW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:23:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262936AbUDEQXW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:23:22 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:42465 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262917AbUDEQXU (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:23:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:19:33 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: "Tony A. Lambley" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [usbfs] 2.6.3+ devmode? Message-Id: <20040405091933.3295744a.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1081096740.2235.6.camel@bony> References: <1081096740.2235.6.camel@bony> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: +5V?h'hZQPB9kW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 12:39:00 -0400 Tony A. Lambley wrote: | Hi, is my brain going yolky? I have perm problems with a scanner after | each boot, and have to manually locate the scanner in /proc/bus/usb then | chmod it. | | My fstab has: | | none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 | | It happens with 2.6.3 through to .5. Am I doing something wrong or is | usbfs+devmode a bit under the weather? I think that's related to kernel bug #1418: http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1418 | Or maybe I shouldn't be using usbfs? Is it being depreciated? No, it's not being deprecated. -- ~Randy