mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
To: Carlos Fernandez Sanz <cfs-lk@nisupu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3com issues in 2.6.5
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:05:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040405110541.B22980@animx.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003301c41b18$38ff7f90$1530a8c0@HUSH>; from Carlos Fernandez Sanz on Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:13:51PM +0200

> I'm trying to track down my problems with my NIC in 2.6.5 (worked fine in
> 2.4.22). The network "works" but very very slow, and ifconfig shows almost
> the same count in the Tx packet and carrier count:
> 
> TX packets:23818 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:23817
> 
> dmesg for 2.4.22 and 2.6.5 are almost identical, except for the last lines
> in 2.4.22 (vortex_up, etc). There are no (apparently important) different in
> vortex-diag. mii-diag, however, fails to run in 2.6.5 while it works in
> 2.4.22.
> 
>  Dumps follow, in case someone can shed light.
> 
> (BTW: lsmod in 2.4.22 shows the module as busy (used twice, because I have
> two identical NICs, while in 2.6.5 it seems to be unused - I can unload the
> module with both interfaces up, but obviously as soon as I do that they
> dissapear - I assume this is the intended 2.6 behaviour).

Let me ask you, are you noticing slowness sending or receiving?  I'm having
a similar problem (2.4.25 and 2.6.4 is slow).  I had upgraded the machine
and kernel at the same time.  The nic is a 3c905b+mba nic (it netboots). 
Receiving seems fairly quick, but sending seems slow.  My definition of slow
is "not to it's full speed".  I see about 5mb/sec when I transfer files from
that machine (the disk was capable of 26mb/sec on a file, over network it
was about 5mb/sec)  I noticed the nic was sharing an IRQ (12) with the sound
card (not in use at all).

I should downgrade to 2.4.22 to see if I see a difference.  Oddly, I had
this same board in another machine (which was upgraded) using a 3c990 nic
w/o problems (kernel 2.6.x).  However, I didn't often send files at full
speed either.

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-05 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-05 14:13 Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2004-04-05 15:05 ` Wakko Warner [this message]
2004-04-05 15:08   ` Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2004-04-05 15:28     ` Hugo Mills
2004-04-05 15:57       ` Gene Heskett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040405110541.B22980@animx.eu.org \
    --to=wakko@animx.eu.org \
    --cc=cfs-lk@nisupu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®