mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, ak@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anton@samba.org, paulus@samba.org,
	linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: RFC: COW for hugepages
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:24:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040407202443.78078b59.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040408030923.GA29551@zax>

David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > I don't see much in the COW code which is ppc64-specific.  All the hardware
>  > needs to do is to provide a way to make the big pages readonly.  With a bit
>  > of an abstraction for the TLB manipulation in there it should be pretty
>  > straightforward.
>  > 
>  > Certainly worth the attempt, no?
> 
>  Yes, you have a point.  However doing it in a cross-arch way will
>  require building more of a shared abstraction about hugepage pte
>  entries that exists currently.  And that will mean making significant
>  changes to all the archs to create that abstraction.  I don't know
>  enough about the other archs to be confident of debugging such
>  changes, but I'll see what I can do.

Well the first step is to consolidate the existing duplication in 2.6.5
before thinking about new features.  That's largely a cut-n-paste job which
I've been meaning to get onto but alas have not.  I don't want to dump it
on you just because you want to tend to your COWs so if you have other
things to do, please let me know.

We could use the `weak' attribute in mm/hugetlbpage.c for those cases where
one arch really needs to do something different.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-08  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-07  7:42 David Gibson
2004-04-07  7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-07  8:03   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-07  8:29   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-08  1:57     ` David Gibson
2004-04-07  9:00 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2004-04-08  1:53   ` David Gibson
2004-04-08 11:10     ` Zoltan Menyhart
2004-04-08 14:19       ` David Gibson
2004-04-07 12:34 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-07 14:27   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-07 14:50     ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-07 21:41       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-07 21:47         ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-08  1:11   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-08  2:01     ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-08  3:09       ` David Gibson
2004-04-08  3:24         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-04-08  3:56           ` David Gibson
2004-04-08  1:50   ` David Gibson
2004-04-07 15:21 ` Dave Hansen
2004-04-08  3:22   ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040407202443.78078b59.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome