From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262910AbUDHUjo (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:39:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262784AbUDHUcf (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:32:35 -0400 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:63973 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262438AbUDHTuh (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:50:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:50:01 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Paul Jackson Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, wli@holomorphy.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Patch 15/23 - Bitmaps, Cpumasks and Nodemasks Message-Id: <20040408125001.7938aa3e.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040408115050.2c67311a.pj@sgi.com> References: <20040408115050.2c67311a.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org P15.cpumask_sched_refine- Cpumask code clarification in kernel/sched.c Clarify and slightly optimize set_cpus_allowed() cpumask check Index: 2.6.5.bitmap/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- 2.6.5.bitmap.orig/kernel/sched.c 2004-04-08 09:39:29.000000000 -0700 +++ 2.6.5.bitmap/kernel/sched.c 2004-04-08 09:40:08.000000000 -0700 @@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ runqueue_t *rq; rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); - if (any_online_cpu(new_mask) == NR_CPUS) { + if (!cpus_intersects(new_mask, cpu_online_map)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373