From: Petri Kaukasoina <kaukasoi@elektroni.ee.tut.fi>
To: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
george anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
David Ford <david+powerix@blue-labs.org>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /proc or ps tools bug? 2.6.3, time is off
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:14:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040415161436.GA21613@elektroni.ee.tut.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0404151302140.28278@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 01:05:17PM +0200, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Petri Kaukasoina wrote:
>
> > If we are still talking about the problem with ps showing process start
> > times in future, I'm sorry neither of the patches helped. The error grows
> > here at a rate of 15 seconds in 24 hours as before.
>
> Oops...
> sure, it cannot. Maybe this one is better...
>
>
> --- linux-2.6.5/include/linux/times.h 2004-02-04 04:43:09.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.5-jfix1/include/linux/times.h 2004-04-15 12:59:05.000000000 +0200
Yes, it seems to have fixed it. There is a small error: ps shows a start
time of a new minute about four seconds too early, but the error stays
constant and does not change as a function of uptime any longer. (Actually
it still does but only at the same rate as ntpd corrects time.)
-Petri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 1:58 David Ford
2004-02-25 1:54 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-25 5:10 ` David Ford
2004-02-25 3:27 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-25 16:28 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-25 16:04 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-25 20:45 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-25 19:16 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-25 21:10 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-26 1:52 ` john stultz
2004-02-26 23:06 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-26 23:10 ` john stultz
2004-02-27 0:20 ` George Anzinger
2004-04-13 22:38 ` john stultz
2004-04-13 22:59 ` George Anzinger
2004-04-14 12:10 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-04-14 17:03 ` George Anzinger
2004-04-14 18:28 ` john stultz
2004-04-15 10:37 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2004-04-15 11:05 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-04-15 16:14 ` Petri Kaukasoina [this message]
2004-05-01 13:51 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-05-02 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-02 1:59 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-05-04 2:40 ` john stultz
2004-05-04 6:12 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-05-04 14:59 ` john stultz
2004-05-04 16:50 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-05-07 0:33 ` George Anzinger
2004-05-07 1:21 ` john stultz
2004-05-07 20:41 ` George Anzinger
2004-05-07 21:38 ` john stultz
2004-02-26 23:14 ` George Anzinger
2004-02-25 9:14 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2004-02-25 9:18 ` Petri Kaukasoina
2004-02-25 21:39 ` David Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040415161436.GA21613@elektroni.ee.tut.fi \
--to=kaukasoi@elektroni.ee.tut.fi \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=david+powerix@blue-labs.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®