On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 11:30:53AM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
> Quote from Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>:
> > 
> > --=-De0mPL9BnMYZGB8TurTV
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > 
> > On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 12:20, John Bradford wrote:
> > > Quote from Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>:
> > > > You are suggesting that 2.6 is not stable ?  How could that be ?
> > >=20
> > > It hasn't exactly been audited for security issues yet.
> > 
> > neither has the biggest part of the 2.4 codebase.
> 
> A valid point, but last time I checked, there were known exploits that had
> been fixed in 2.4 but not in 2.6.

maybe you should check again and report what you find because I for sure
can't think of any.