From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:55:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040422015556.55b4db0a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16641351.1082623864205.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com>
Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >Is it not possible to call sys_unlink() directly from there? Something like
> >
> >long kernel_unlink(const char *name)
> >{
> > mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> > long ret;
> >
> > set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> > ret = sys_unlink(name);
> > set_fs(old_fs);
> > return ret;
> >}
>
> And you're asking me? ;)
Well someone has to know ;)
> While getname() has a check for user/kernelspace - do you really
> care about "the overhead" for a function call level with 1 argument?
> Uhm, probably if you even care to write this..
It's very small, but heck, we unlink a lot more often than we dump core.
Most of us, that is.
> What is the cost for switching the segments?
Teeny.
> But I agree that sys_unlink should be the fast call and dumping core
> is the exception :)
>
> would fastcall do_unlink() help? I guess the arg is then passed in a
> register
I've never been able to measure any size or space benefit for fastcall, and
we do it via compiler options kernel-wide nowadays.
The above will work fine. You can probably just open-code it at the place
where you're unlinking the file.
(why are you trying to unlink the old file anyway?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-22 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-22 8:51 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 8:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 15:35 Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 19:14 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 17:22 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 7:46 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 7:16 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 17:10 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-23 19:05 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 7:14 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 9:40 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 9:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-22 19:43 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 19:53 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-22 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-21 19:20 Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040422015556.55b4db0a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pwaechtler@mac.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®