mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, Jon D Mason <jonmason@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH r8169] ethtool support and sane speed selection/detection
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:44:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040424124453.A25284@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040424050931.14C341D4F@luto.stanford.edu>; from luto@myrealbox.com on Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 10:08:25PM -0700

[Jeff Garzik added to the loop]
[If nobody disagrees, I'll remove l-k from the Cc: during the next round]

Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com> :
> This adds ethtool support to r8169.

Cool.

> Some notes:  I stole the RxUnderrun interrupt status bit because (1) I
> don't know what a recieve underrun is, (2) the specs say that bit is
> actually "link status changed" and (3) simple tests seem to confirm that.

Ok, this bit is named 'LinkChg' in drivers/net/8139cp.c as well.

> Speed selection doesn't actually set a forced mode but just sets
> autonegotiation to advertise only one speed.  (This way there is no ugly
> special case for 1000Mbps.)
> 
> The link status is no longer checked on startup because it is slow and, with
> ethtool support, unnecessary.

Just to clarify, it is still done in rtl8169_open() instead of rtl8169_init_one().
Even if it is a change of behavior in a supposedly stable serie, I guess it is ok
as it moves the driver in the direction of the 8139cp driver.

> As an added benefit, my 8001S often fails to negotiate 1000Mbps when the
> driver loads but will successfully negotiate it after a while.  Running
> 'ethtool -s ethx autoneg on' fixes it, but that's absurd.  This patch
> will, ten seconds after the driver starts, check if 1000Mbps is advertised
> but not selected, and, if so, force a renegotiation.

So you can not reliably remove the phy timer and simply use the LinkChg status
change, right ?

Is everybody fine if I cook up a serie of patches for -netdev/-mm inclusion
which includes:
- your link related changes
- start of a 8139cp.c genetic mutation on top of those
- reworked Jon D Mason's NAPI changes

ETA: this week end, start of incoming week.

--
Ueimor

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-24 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-24  5:08 Andy Lutomirski
2004-04-24 10:44 ` Francois Romieu [this message]
2004-04-28 12:42 ` Felipe W Damasio
2004-04-28 15:24   ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040424124453.A25284@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com \
    --to=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=jonmason@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@myrealbox.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®