From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264191AbUD0Qvp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:51:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264198AbUD0Qvp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:51:45 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:60382 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264191AbUD0Qve (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:51:34 -0400 X-Authenticated: #1226656 Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:51:24 +0200 From: Marc Giger To: Marc Giger Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: status of Linux on Alpha? Message-Id: <20040427185124.134073cd@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> In-Reply-To: <20040413194907.7ce8ceb7@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> References: <20040328201719.A14868@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040328204308.C14868@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040328221806.7fa20502@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> <20040329205233.5b7905aa@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> <20040404121032.7bb42b35@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> <20040409134534.67805dfd@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> <20040409134828.0e2984e5@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> <20040409230651.A727@den.park.msu.ru> <20040413194907.7ce8ceb7@vaio.gigerstyle.ch> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, What's the current status of the problem? Is nobody interested to fix it, or am I just impatient? Did I provide not enough information? I'm running 2.6.5 with the reverted patch for 2 weeks now without any problems. Regards Marc On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:49:07 +0200 Marc Giger wrote: > Hi Ivan, All > > First, sorry for the cross posting... > > After long sessions of patching, recompiling, and testing I finally > found the cause of my problems. XFS people, please read: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108047692409817&w=2 > and > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107910319729364&w=2 > > After reverting 1.1608.29.12 all is fine again. > Interestingly, this patch was listed on bkbits between 2.6.3 > and 2.6.4-rc1 but was added to the source tree between 2.6.4-rc1 and > 2.6.4-rc2 :-( Again something learned for the future... > > Ivan, I think your new semaphore code is still ok because it doesn't > matter if it is the new or old code. Both versions have a problem with > the xfs-patch. > > For further questions you know how to reach me:-) > > greets > > Marc > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 23:06:51 +0400 > Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:48:28PM +0200, Marc Giger wrote: > > > > Presently, I reached a stage on which I don't know longer what > > > > to do:-( I isolated the problem between 2.6.3-rc1 and 2.6.3-rc2. > > > > I > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > read as 2.6.4-rc1 and 2.6.4-rc2 > > > > Thanks for your work. > > > > > > also reverted 1.1608.56.1 , 1.1608.51.36 and all xfs related > > > > patches from rc2 with no luck. > > > > All other changes seems unrelated to me. > > > > I'd also revert 1.1608.51.22 and all networking changes. > > > > Ivan. > > > >