From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262142AbUD2VvG@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262142AbUD2VvG (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:51:06 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264990AbUD2VtL
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:49:11 -0400
Received: from mesa.unizar.es ([155.210.11.66]:18664 "EHLO relay.unizar.es")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264981AbUD2VsI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:48:08 -0400
From: "Jorge Bernal (Koke)" <koke_lkml@amedias.org>
Reply-To: koke@sindominio.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:47:16 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
Cc: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>, Paul Wagland <paul@wagland.net>,
       Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
       David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
       Marc Boucher <marc@linuxant.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404291114150.9152-100000@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com> <4FE43C97-9A20-11D8-B804-000A95CD704C@wagland.net> <4091757B.3090209@techsource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4091757B.3090209@techsource.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200404292347.17431.koke_lkml@amedias.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Jueves, 29 de Abril de 2004 23:36, Timothy Miller wrote:
>
> Hmmm... how about "untrusted"?  Not sure...
>

I like "untrusted". Another option is some like "binary only modules can make 
your system unstable and kernel developers have nothing to do with that" (but 
well written, and shorter if possible).

-- 
Jorge Bernal aka. Koke
koke@amedias.org // koke@sindominio.net
JID: koke@zgzjabber.ath.cx