From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262488AbUEAWvf (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 18:51:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262503AbUEAWvf (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 18:51:35 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:59534 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262488AbUEAWve (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 18:51:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 15:51:16 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kaos@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6-mm] Allow i386 to reenable interrupts on lock contention Message-Id: <20040501155116.6ac6e253.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <2015.1083331968@ocs3.ocs.com.au> <20040501143955.10d1cea1.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > On Sat, 1 May 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Could we move all the irq-handling stuff into the out-of-line section, to > > keep the fast-path cache footprint smaller? > > Of course, oversight on my part. Done and restested. Thanks. Would be nice to find some test which showed improved throughput from this ;)