From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262756AbUEBABw (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 20:01:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262766AbUEBABw (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 20:01:52 -0400 Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.101]:40632 "EHLO pimout2-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262756AbUEBABv (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 20:01:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 17:00:46 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , bunk@fs.tum.de, eyal@eyal.emu.id.au, linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-rc3: modular DVB tda1004x broken Message-ID: <20040502000046.GA24649@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <408F9BD8.8000203@eyal.emu.id.au> <20040501201342.GL2541@fs.tum.de> <20040501161035.67205a1f.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 04:55:30PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes. Except we should probably only do this for __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, > since it's possible that somebody is still using this in user space > (it pre-glibc people). I'm confused. I thought it has been decreed using kernel headers in userspace was a bad idea (DONT DO THAT) so in theory we can just ignore this issue? --cw