From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264391AbUEEJyB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2004 05:54:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264419AbUEEJyB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2004 05:54:01 -0400 Received: from port-212-202-41-96.reverse.qsc.de ([212.202.41.96]:58775 "EHLO rocklinux-consulting.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264412AbUEEJx5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2004 05:53:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 11:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040505.115350.52162881.rene@rocklinux-consulting.de> To: mikpe@csd.uu.se Cc: rmrmg@wp.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m.c.p@kernel.linux-systeme.com Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.27-pre2 (gcc-3.4.0) From: Rene Rebe In-Reply-To: <16536.46148.924407.411523@alkaid.it.uu.se> References: <20040505.083644.241899480.rene@rocklinux-consulting.de> <20040505101553.7110da0c.rmrmg@wp.pl> <16536.46148.924407.411523@alkaid.it.uu.se> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1 on XEmacs 21.4.13 (Rational FORTRAN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "heap.localnet", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:30:44 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20Rafa=B3?= 'rmrmg' Roszak writes: > > begin Rene Rebe quote: > > > > > It is for 2.4.26 - but should apply mostly to 2.4.27-pre2, too - I > > > have not yet booted the resulting kernel, soo .... > > > > patching file kernel/sysctl.c > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 879 (offset 3 lines). > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1133 (offset 3 lines). > > patching file lib/brlock.c > > patching file lib/crc32.c > > patching file lib/rwsem.c > > patching file lib/string.c > > patching file mm/filemap.c > > patching file mm/memory.c > > patching file mm/page_alloc.c > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 82. > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 241 (offset 41 lines). > > Hunk #4 succeeded at 295 (offset 41 lines). > > Hunk #6 succeeded at 486 (offset 41 lines). > > Hunk #8 succeeded at 509 (offset 41 lines). > > 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/page_alloc.c.rej > > Read the archives, a solution has been available since last week. Use: > http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/patches/2.4/patch-gcc340-fixes-2.4.27-pre2 > > This has been throughly tested on i386 and x86_64 UP and SMP, and ppc UP, > although I have not verified drivers I don't use myself. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:30:44 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Rafa³ 'rmrmg' Roszak writes: > > begin Rene Rebe quote: > > > > > It is for 2.4.26 - but should apply mostly to 2.4.27-pre2, too - I > > > have not yet booted the resulting kernel, soo .... > > > > patching file kernel/sysctl.c > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 879 (offset 3 lines). > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1133 (offset 3 lines). > > patching file lib/brlock.c > > patching file lib/crc32.c > > patching file lib/rwsem.c > > patching file lib/string.c > > patching file mm/filemap.c > > patching file mm/memory.c > > patching file mm/page_alloc.c > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 82. > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 241 (offset 41 lines). > > Hunk #4 succeeded at 295 (offset 41 lines). > > Hunk #6 succeeded at 486 (offset 41 lines). > > Hunk #8 succeeded at 509 (offset 41 lines). > > 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/page_alloc.c.rej > > Read the archives, a solution has been available since last week. Use: > http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/patches/2.4/patch-gcc340-fixes-2.4.27-pre2 > > This has been throughly tested on i386 and x86_64 UP and SMP, and ppc UP, > although I have not verified drivers I don't use myself. IIRC I based "my" patch uppon your's rediffed one chunk for 2.4.26 and added some more driver fixes (since our build system automatically enables as many as possible ... So your patch alone should not fix this error - unfortunatly I'm already fixing so many user-space apps for gcc-3.4 that I have not the time to track 2.4.27 right now. Sincerely yours, René Rebe - ROCK Linux stable release maintainer -- René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin rene@rocklinux.org rene@rocklinux-consulting.de http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux-consulting.de