On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:58:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie> wrote:
> >
> > Fair enough but have a look at the other fault from that bug though:
> > 
> >  	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=99855&action=view 
> > 
> >  That one did not recurse for some reason.
> 
> OK.
> 
> So we're 50 to 60 levels deep in function calls there and simply ran out
> of 4k stack.


no that call trace is AFTER you overflow, eg wrong stack