From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264316AbUEIJC4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 05:02:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264322AbUEIJC4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 05:02:56 -0400 Received: from moraine.clusterfs.com ([66.246.132.190]:23197 "EHLO moraine.clusterfs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264316AbUEIJCx (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 05:02:53 -0400 From: "Peter J. Braam" To: Cc: , , , "'Anton Blanchard'" Subject: RE: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 17:01:54 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcQwHr/n2dBTZBe2RBqO7890Zt+jxwFgtqrQ In-Reply-To: <1083486146.3842.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Message-Id: <20040509090249.A78D03100BD@moraine.clusterfs.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, I would just like to say that I have no difficulties with intermezzo being rm -rf'd. There are probably only a handful of users. In the past 4 years nobody has supported InterMezzo sufficiently for it to become successful. I have been fortunate to get really good support for the Lustre project. So I have focussed on that. Lustre 1.X has become really solid. The disconnected operation, caching and mirroring functionality of InterMezzo will become available in Lustre as a new feature in version 2. So I see no point in keeping InterMezzo if it is a nuisance. I am also entirely happy to ask my one part time InterMezzo programmer to do a better job of repeatedly sending pathes until they are in. Please guide me along. Thanks! - Peter - > -----Original Message----- > From: intermezzo-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:intermezzo-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On > Behalf Of Arjan van de Ven > Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 4:22 PM > To: Anton Blanchard > Cc: akpm@osdl.org; intermezzo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory > > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this: > > I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now... >