From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264426AbUEJAVJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 20:21:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264425AbUEJAVJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 20:21:09 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:3541 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264426AbUEJAVD (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 20:21:03 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 17:20:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Un-inline spinlocks on ppc64 Message-Id: <20040509172038.55319fbd.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <16542.51381.215308.485006@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <16542.51381.215308.485006@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Mackerras wrote: > > The patch below moves the ppc64 spinlocks and rwlocks out of line and > into arch/ppc64/lib/locks.c, and implements _raw_spin_lock_flags for > ppc64. > It included a hunk against include/asm-ppc64/offsets.h, which I dropped. > ... > This patch depends on the patch from Keith Owens to add > _raw_spin_lock_flags. If you decide to drop that patch, let me know > and I can do a new version without _raw_spin_lock_flags. Keith's patch and Zwane's x86 implemeentation are queued up and seem to work OK, so all is well, thanks.